THIS MATERIAL IS A MARKETING COMMUNICATION.
Chinese Equity Markets Experienced A Meaningful Decline In Early July Due To Intensifying Regulation Uncertainty
Q: Why people fear China’s regulation overhang?
A: Chinese equity markets experienced a meaningful decline in early July, triggered by a Government ban of a recent market acquisition made by Didi (following the ride-hailing company’s reported breach in cybersecurity laws).
The punishment handed down on Didi is considered to be the another in a series of Government intervention, as efforts to regulate internet platform companies in fintech, e-commerce, food delivery, online education and gaming increase.
Due to this regulation uncertainty, and fundamentally; concerns the Government may no-longer be proponents of growth and tech-innovation, investors have significantly reduced their holdings in China equities.
While we agree that regulation uncertainty is bad news for the market, we strongly disagree with the second notion and continue to have high conviction in the Government being supportive of growth.
Q: What are the nature of these regulations?
A: From our perspective the regulations being introduced are reasonable and fair, reflecting social consensus and in line with Chinese social values.
For instance, there has been regulation overhang on food delivery platform Meituan for some time, speculating the company may be ‘forced’ to provide higher salaries or insurance coverage to its delivery riders.
Meituan was reluctant to resolve the issue earlier, because they think that most riders working on the platform are temporary workers or 3rd party agency hired, meaning that it would not be their direct responsibility.
However, as the company become so large to hire 5 million workers, demand from society has ever grown louder.
From the society perspectives, in our opinion, any regulation to improve workplace conditions is the right decision, as food delivery riders have arguably been working under dangerous and distressing work conditions while pay not enough.
Another example of regulation overhang is in the ’After-School Tutoring (AST)’ sector. AST has become a cause for concern by a vast majority of the middle-class in urban China, due to the increased financial burden on parents and increased mental burden on children. Fast becoming a social problem, the latest rumor is the Government will be forced to act by introducing restrictions on AST operating hours.
Price cutting on generic drugs is an area of recent Government reform. Over the last three years, through six round of group purchasing auctions (nationwide), old generic drug prices have fallen by 50%1 and more on average. Being bad to generic drug makers’ bottom-line, it was an area that needed urgent reform; not only because old generic drugs were too expensive in China, but also because it consumed large portions of public medical insurance. It detracted companies from investing in innovative drug R&D due to the complacency of generating high returns from generic drugs. Due to regulation changes limiting price cutting, we have seen an impressive emergence of innovative drugs from Chinese local companies such as Innovent, Henrui, Junshi, etc.
Malpractice and reducing competition across e-commerce platforms where companies such as Alibaba would typically discourage merchants to sell items on rival platforms, enforcing an exclusivity have been banned. We think this policy is very reasonable and necessary to ensure fairer competition.
In Didi’s case, it is a bit different being a result of the US-China conflict. At the moment, we are not yet clear how Didi breached cybersecurity laws but according to market speculation, the issue stems from the company possibly sharing data with the US SEC, albeit the data could be minor or negligible information for what we know.
The Chinese Government have big concerns about the potential of critical data being leaked to the US via US- listed Chinese companies. Following several years of geopolitical conflict between US and China, a HK exchange listing rather than NY exchange listing has been shown to help avoid these issues.
Further, China is different and outstanding among emerging countries. It’s clearly regulation heavy, but it has a virtue prohibiting any economic interest group or company to yield monopolistic powers over its society.
In summary, we view most of the regulation changes as reasonable and even desirable, reflecting current social values. Based on our vast experience of investing in emerging markets, we often encounter cases where vested interest groups, family businesses and conglomerates hamper innovations and growth in a country. We welcome positive changes that help to ensure a competitive and sustainable economic environment
Q: How we positioned and what we will do?
A: Firstly, we believe there is plenty of untapped growth opportunity in China equities. The powerful and effective way to capture it, is simply to follow the development stage of its economy. China is regulation-heavy but also support-heavy, and the government has a strong track record of supporting businesses to serve China’s social needs. These days, social needs include clean air, energy and technology independence from the US to name a few.
Across Chinese society; appreciation of mercantilism value is high. i.e., The perception that exporters are good for society and any company with export ability is highly regarded. We try to capture innovative opportunities in areas like solar, EV battery, semiconductor, automation, AI, exporters to name a few.
Secondly, we are and should be cautious of mature internet platform companies. If an internet platform already hold a monopolistic position of 60%-plus market share, their business is by its nature a “public utilities” service, comparable to power utility or water utility companies. Key features of “utilities companies” is they should place social service as its first priority, rather than shareholder profit. Hence, these internet platforms don’t deserve a high valuation multiple. We still have an exposure to Alibaba and Tencent, based on their valuation being low relative to the market. In contrast however, there are several internet companies that trade at extremely high valuation multiples that we avoid.
Thirdly, it’s important to note that regulation in China have some characteristics of cyclicality, like a pendulum swinging. Why? Heavy regulations tend to create business disruption and hamper employment markets. For example, operating hour restrictions on AST (which is rumored) may hurt millions of teachers and relevant workers in the AST industry. Heavy regulation periods tend to be followed by a light regulation cycle. Currently, we are undergoing one of the most severe regulatory cycles in a decade, which imply a much easier period down the track.
Lastly, in our view regulation is a short-term pain but a healthy long-term development gain. Despite much discussion on anti-trust action across the world, no other country has successfully reigned in giant corporations. The Chinese Government has at least made good its first step to tackle vested interest groups in its society while creating an environment for further innovation and business start-up’s.
Overall, we are optimistic on China’s innovation trends and trajectory of its growth stocks while paying attention to new and unconventional areas and matters across its market and economy.
Staying Ahead with Mirae Asset’s Latest Insights
1Source: Reuters, as of 28 December 2020.
Disclaimer & Information for Investors
No distribution, solicitation or advice: This document is provided for information and illustrative purposes and is intended for your use only. It is not a solicitation, offer or recommendation to buy or sell any security or other financial instrument. The information contained in this document has been provided as a general market commentary only and does not constitute any form of regulated financial advice, legal, tax or other regulated service.
The views and information discussed or referred in this document are as of the date of publication. Certain of the statements contained in this document are statements of future expectations and other forward-looking statements. Views, opinions and estimates may change without notice and are based on a number of assumptions which may or may not eventuate or prove to be accurate. Actual results, performance or events may differ materially from those in such statements. In addition, the opinions expressed may differ from those of other Mirae Asset Global Investments’ investment professionals.
Investment involves risk: Past performance is not indicative of future performance. It cannot be guaranteed that the performance of the Fund will generate a return and there may be circumstances where no return is generated or the amount invested is lost. It may not be suitable for persons unfamiliar with the underlying securities or who are unwilling or unable to bear the risk of loss and ownership of such investment. Before making any investment decision, investors should read the Prospectus for details and the risk factors. Investors should ensure they fully understand the risks associated with the Fund and should also consider their own investment objective and risk tolerance level. Investors are advised to seek independent professional advice before making any investment.
Sources: Information and opinions presented in this document have been obtained or derived from sources which in the opinion of Mirae Asset Global Investments (“MAGI”) are reliable, but we make no representation as to their accuracy or completeness. We accept no liability for a loss arising from the use of this document.
Products, services and information may not be available in your jurisdiction and may be offered by affiliates, subsidiaries and/or distributors of MAGI as stipulated by local laws and regulations. Please consult with your professional adviser for further information on the availability of products and services within your jurisdiction. This document is issued by Mirae Asset Global Investments (HK) Limited and has not been reviewed by the Securities and Futures Commission.
Information for EU investors pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/1156: This document is a marketing communication and is intended for Professional Investors only. A Prospectus is available for the Mirae Asset Global Discovery Fund (the “Company”) a société d'investissement à capital variable (SICAV) domiciled in Luxembourg structured as an umbrella with a number of sub-funds. Key Investor Information Documents (“KIIDs”) are available for each share class of each of the sub-funds of the Company.
The Company’s Prospectus and the KIIDs can be obtained from www.am.miraeasset.eu/fund-literature . The Prospectus is available in English, French, German, and Danish, while the KIIDs are available in one of the official languages of each of the EU Member States into which each sub-fund has been notified for marketing under the Directive 2009/65/EC (the “UCITS Directive”). Please refer to the Prospectus and the KIID before making any final investment decisions.
A summary of investor rights is available in English from www.am.miraeasset.eu/investor-rights-summary.
The sub-funds of the Company are currently notified for marketing into a number of EU Member States under the UCITS Directive. FundRock Management Company can terminate such notifications for any share class and/or sub-fund of the Company at any time using the process contained in Article 93a of the UCITS Directive.
Hong Kong: This document is intended for Hong Kong investors. Before making any investment decision to invest in the Fund, Investors should read the Fund’s Prospectus and the information for Hong Kong investors (of applicable) of the Fund for details and the risk factors. The individual and Mirae Asset Global Investments (Hong Kong) Limited may hold the individual securities mentioned. This document is issued by Mirae Asset Global Investments (HK) Limited and has not been reviewed by the Securities and Futures Commission.
Copyright 2021. All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission of Mirae Asset Global Investments (Hong Kong) Limited.