Asia Thematic Insights: The Next Frontier for Solar-grade Wafer

THIS MATERIAL IS A MARKETING COMMUNICATION.

Asia Thematic Insights: The Next Frontier for Solar-grade Wafer


Q1: What was happening in solar upstream in the last decade?

Solar upstream consists of solar-grade polysilicon and wafer.

Mass-production of solar-grade polysilicon started in early 2000s when the German government firstly ramped up the promotion of clean energy. Chinese government has instigated a push to take over global demand and supply since 2013. After that, we have seen Asian companies, especially a number of Chinese companies stepped into the history, in which GCL-Poly Energy (GCL) is an important company who was dedicated to polysilicon cost cut. GCL pioneered key equipment import substitution and production method improvement to ultimately cut machinery investment in addition to materials and energy consumption. Some followers subsequently located their new capacities in west China where power cost is as low as CNY 0.2/kWh.1 They further reduced the cost by a series of capacity expansions to enjoy the economy of scale.

Longi Green Energy (Longi) is another vital company in wafer part. Similar as GCL, Longi made great contribution in equipment manufacturing domestically to cut the fixed investment. They were the first to adopt diamond cut line and bring in mono-Si wafer to mass production. It significantly improved the solar cell conversion efficiency and reduced solar cost in terms of Levelised cost of energy (LCOE).

We have seen polysilicon and wafer price decline by over 90%1 in the last decade. Chinese players’ cost advantages as well as supply chain coordination and collaboration help them keep gaining market share in the world. In terms of capacity, the top five Chinese polysilicon producers’ market share reached 56% in 2019 compared to 11% in 2010, and the top five wafer makers’ global market share increased from 20% to 70%2 during the same period.

Q2: How do we think of the business nature?

Polysilicon production is a typical chemical purification process with four key inputs: metallic silicon, purification equipment, energy and labor. China enjoys the lowest cost in metallic silicon, power and labor. After substitution with domestic equipment, Chinese players established the absolute cutting-edge in global competition.

Solar-grade wafer production is essentially a fine manufacturing business with four key inputs as well: solar-grade polysilicon, equipment and auxiliary materials (ingot furnace, cutting machine and diamond cutting lines), energy and labor. Similar to polysilicon, after China could produce key equipment and auxiliary materials by their own, Chinese wafer makers had mastery over all the cheaper inputs in massive production. It results in further cost advantages in lower logistics cost and less frictions in tariff and supply chain stability, coupled with leading polysilicon production.

Q3: What are the implications on the future?

In the long term, there are a few ways to cut production costs in solar upstream: 1) Equipment innovation to reduce energy consumption and unit cost; 2) Economy of scale to lower fixed cost amortization; 3) Revolutionary changes to silicon-based solar cell. Moreover, purification methods improvement and more efficient wafer could also help reduce the cost in polysilicon and wafer, respectively. We will keep an eye closely on technology innovation, and would like to hold a conservative view on who will ultimately succeed in the long term, although the current cost leaders are likely to keep consolidating their leading positions in both technology and cost cut.

Asia Thematic Insights: The Next Frontier for Solar-grade Wafer


Q1: What was happening in solar upstream in the last decade?

Solar upstream consists of solar-grade polysilicon and wafer.

Mass-production of solar-grade polysilicon started in early 2000s when the German government firstly ramped up the promotion of clean energy. Chinese government has instigated a push to take over global demand and supply since 2013. After that, we have seen Asian companies, especially a number of Chinese companies stepped into the history, in which GCL-Poly Energy (GCL) is an important company who was dedicated to polysilicon cost cut. GCL pioneered key equipment import substitution and production method improvement to ultimately cut machinery investment in addition to materials and energy consumption. Some followers subsequently located their new capacities in west China where power cost is as low as CNY 0.2/kWh.1 They further reduced the cost by a series of capacity expansions to enjoy the economy of scale.

Longi Green Energy (Longi) is another vital company in wafer part. Similar as GCL, Longi made great contribution in equipment manufacturing domestically to cut the fixed investment. They were the first to adopt diamond cut line and bring in mono-Si wafer to mass production. It significantly improved the solar cell conversion efficiency and reduced solar cost in terms of Levelised cost of energy (LCOE).

We have seen polysilicon and wafer price decline by over 90%1 in the last decade. Chinese players’ cost advantages as well as supply chain coordination and collaboration help them keep gaining market share in the world. In terms of capacity, the top five Chinese polysilicon producers’ market share reached 56% in 2019 compared to 11% in 2010, and the top five wafer makers’ global market share increased from 20% to 70%2 during the same period.

Q2: How do we think of the business nature?

Polysilicon production is a typical chemical purification process with four key inputs: metallic silicon, purification equipment, energy and labor. China enjoys the lowest cost in metallic silicon, power and labor. After substitution with domestic equipment, Chinese players established the absolute cutting-edge in global competition.

Solar-grade wafer production is essentially a fine manufacturing business with four key inputs as well: solar-grade polysilicon, equipment and auxiliary materials (ingot furnace, cutting machine and diamond cutting lines), energy and labor. Similar to polysilicon, after China could produce key equipment and auxiliary materials by their own, Chinese wafer makers had mastery over all the cheaper inputs in massive production. It results in further cost advantages in lower logistics cost and less frictions in tariff and supply chain stability, coupled with leading polysilicon production.

Q3: What are the implications on the future?

In the long term, there are a few ways to cut production costs in solar upstream: 1) Equipment innovation to reduce energy consumption and unit cost; 2) Economy of scale to lower fixed cost amortization; 3) Revolutionary changes to silicon-based solar cell. Moreover, purification methods improvement and more efficient wafer could also help reduce the cost in polysilicon and wafer, respectively. We will keep an eye closely on technology innovation, and would like to hold a conservative view on who will ultimately succeed in the long term, although the current cost leaders are likely to keep consolidating their leading positions in both technology and cost cut.

AUTHORED BY
Bingyao Chen, PhD
Investment Analyst – Materials and Real Estate

Date: October 29, 2020
Category: Clean Energy, Video

1 Source: Haitong Research, 2020.07
2 Source: UBS Research, 2020.03


The mentioned companies are strictly for educational and fund marketing purposes only. For more information on our product offering, please refer to our website.

Disclaimer
This document is intended for Hong Kong investors only. This material is neither an offer to sell nor solicitation to buy a security to any person in any jurisdiction where such solicitation, offer, purchase or sale would be unlawful under the laws of that jurisdiction. Investment involves risk.
The information in this material is based on sources we believe to be reliable but we do not guarantee the accuracy of completeness of the information provided. This material has not been reviewed by SFC and shall only be circulated in countries where it is permitted.
This material is intended solely for your private use and shall not be reproduced or recirculated either in whole or in part, without the written permission of Mirae Asset Global Investments. This document has been prepared for presentation, illustration and discussion purposes only and is not legally binding. Whilst compiled from sources Mirae Asset Global Investments believes to be accurate, no representation, warranty, assurance or implication to the accuracy, completeness or adequacy from defect of any kind is made. The division, group, subsidiary or affiliate of Mirae Asset Global Investments which produced this document shall not be liable to the recipient or controlling shareholders of the recipient resulting from its use. The views and information discussed or referred in this report are as of the date of publication, are subject to change and may not reflect the current views of the writer(s). The views expressed represent an assessment of market conditions at a specific point in time, are to be treated as opinions only and should not be relied upon as investment advice regarding a particular investment or markets in general. In addition, the opinions expressed are those of the writer(s) and may differ from those of other Mirae Asset Global Investments’ investment professionals.
The provision of this document shall not be deemed as constituting any offer, acceptance, or promise of any further contract or amendment to any contract which may exist between the parties. The issuer of this article is Mirae Asset Global Investments (HK) Limited (“we”) which we may or our managed funds may hold the mentioned securities. It should not be distributed to any other party except with the written consent of Mirae Asset Global Investments. Nothing herein contained shall be construed as granting the recipient whether directly or indirectly or by implication, any license or right, under any copy right or intellectual property rights to use the information herein. This document may include reference data from third-party sources and Mirae Asset Global Investments has not conducted any audit, validation, or verification of such data. Mirae Asset Global Investments accepts no liability for any loss or damage of any kind resulting out of the unauthorized use of this document. Investment involves risk. Past performance figures are not indicative of future performance. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance. The information presented is not intended to provide specific investment advice. Please carefully read through the offering documents and seek independent professional advice before you make any investment decision. Products, services, and information may not be available in your jurisdiction and may be offered by affiliates, subsidiaries, and/or distributors of Mirae Asset Global Investments as stipulated by local laws and regulations. Please consult with your professional adviser for further information on the availability of products and services within your jurisdiction.
Hong Kong: This material is prepared by Mirae Asset Global Investments (HK) Limited (Mirae HK). Mirae HK is regulated by the SFC (CE reference: ALK083).
Australia: The information contained on this document is provided by Mirae Asset Global Investments (HK) Limited (“MAGIHK”), which is exempt from the requirement to hold an Australian financial services license under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act) pursuant to ASIC Class Order 03/1103 (Class Order) in respect of the financial services it provides to wholesale clients (as defined in the Corporations Act) in Australia. MAGIHK is regulated by the Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong under Hong Kong laws, which differ from Australian laws. Pursuant to the Class Order, this document and any information regarding MAGIHK and its products is strictly provided to and intended for Australian wholesale clients only. By accessing this document and any information or content contained in it, you represent that you are a ‘wholesale client’ under the Corporations Act. This document is strictly for information purposes only and does not constitute a representation that any investment strategy is suitable or appropriate for an investor’s individual circumstances. Further, this document should not be regarded by investors as a substitute for independent professional advice or the exercise of their own judgement. The contents of this document is prepared and maintained by Mirae Asset Global Investments (HK) Limited and has not been reviewed by the Australian Investments & Securities Commission. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission of MAGI HK. Copyright 2020. All rights reserved.