THIS MATERIAL IS A MARKETING COMMUNICATION.
China Innovator Active ETF: Third-Quarter Review
The third quarter of 2021 featured unprecedented market regulation centered on internet platforms, which cooled market sentiment. Yet within months, we’ve observed that the regulatory overhang has already peaked on the back of lighter news flow. This can be attributed to two reasons—the initial batch of market regulation had addressed the social issues caused by internet platforms and impacted employment, while the property sector saw some downward pressure.
From a long-term perspective, we believe that Beijing’s regulatory crackdown during the summer of 2021 is likely to be followed by much lighter regulation in the coming years, as regulations speculated for the mid to long term have already been implemented. Despite the market backdrop, we still maintain a meaningful exposure to internet platform companies, though we have reduced it over the course of this uncertain period.
The MSCI China All Shares Index corrected substantially in light of the market regulations introduced over a short period. Our fund was similarly affected, especially from selling pressure on growth-style stocks. The healthcare sector became the main detractor, while electric vehicles and batteries and clean energy stocks were supportive.
Year to date, growth stocks underperformed against the MSCI China All Shares Index. That said, we are confident that China remains a fertile environment for high-growth stocks, particularly for those in clean energy, electric vehicles and batteries, smart grid, biotechnology, fintech, semiconductors and automation.
Despite investor concerns amid a deepening energy crisis and weakened property market in China, there are some positive developments that have emerged.
Regulatory Backdrop Sets the Scene for Xi Jinping’s Third Term
Regulatory uncertainty has historically been considered as a persistent bear for the China equity market by some market commentators. A combination of government influence and support for particular sectors resulted in some policy overhang. That said, the overall impact was largely manageable through portfolio diversification and the fact we were at different stages of the industry life cycle.
We are faced with questions as to why the latest round of regulatory announcements came within a short time frame. After years of supporting a high-growth economy, Chinese policymakers are now pivoting to social issues caused by anti-competitive behavior in a bid to pursue common prosperity. Yet this time, the political cycle may offer some explanation: Chinese President Xi Jinping is set to head into a third term in power, providing an ample runway to roll out populist policies that are in line with elevating the general population. While China has no direct electoral system to reflect the will of the people, the central government is often keen to win people’s support through these types of policies.
So, on the back of an unprecedented regulatory crackdown on domestic technology giants over the summer, we believe it will be followed by much lighter regulatory changes in the coming years—many policies were brought forward as part of a regulatory overhaul.
Evergrande Event Not Reflective of China
The events surrounding the Evergrande Group’s 2 trillion yuan (US$300 billion) cash shortage created a drag on markets in late September. Some considered the issues with China’s second-largest property developer as a reflection of the state of China’s real estate sector, filled with companies that held private debt or used wealth management product sales to fund operations—drawing comparisons to another “Lehman” event.
However, we see this issue in another light. The Evergrande situation should not be considered as part of a China-centric issue, but a unique case. Recall that Evergrande’s ascension to become one of the largest Chinese developers came about as other developers chose not to expand in the same way to stay in line with government guidelines on curbing leverage and had manageable balance sheets.
This policy guidance is particularly evident in the way Chinese banks have built up reserves over the last decade. In general, Chinese banks had much more prudent balance sheets compared to US investment banks during the subprime mortgage crisis. So, the potential default of Evergrande is unlikely trigger a financial contagion risk.
Chinese banks had built up massive loan loss reserves over last decade, as well as tier one core capital, typically used to fund business activities for bank clients. In the first half of 2020, Chinese banks’ exposure to Evergrande was around 0.24% of total lending, a manageable figure in addition to more than 3% of loan loss reserves and 200% non-performing loan coverage in balance sheets.1 By comparison, US and European banks now have less than 1% in loan loss reserve ratios on average.2 Meanwhile, leverage ratios in Chinese banks, as defined by assets to equity, look prudent at around 10 times that amount.3 With much-improved loan loss reserves, we think that China’s banking system is a world away from the 2008 global financial crisis.
That said, a potential Evergrande default would have a ripple impact on the whole economy. The real estate sector contributes around 20% to gross domestic product, but we expect other positive developments to offset this impact.4 First, corporate investments could be supportive of the economy thanks to strong export growth over the last 18 months.5 Secondly, the government could step in to boost infrastructure projects through fiscal spending and local government bond issuances.
Counterintuitively, sluggish property market conditions could in turn boost the equity market, as one is generally considered a substitute for the other in this market. China in general has a vast amount of domestic savings, yet more than half of household assets remain stuck in real estate.6 The Chinese government has shown a strong will to divert savings to more productive areas such as capital markets, yet this has yet to be fully achieved. However, with lower expectations on property price appreciation in light of the current backdrop, it could provide an incentive for households to consider moving assets into the equity market.
Power Shortage Provides Fuel for Thought
Since late September, some provinces have started rationing power, affecting everything from day-to-day life, energy-intensive industries and GDP growth.
We observe two elements that have contributed towards the energy crisis—first, a supply-demand mismatch in coal has heavily impacted domestic industries. Around 90% of the coal used in China is locally produced.7 Yet year to August, industrial production grew 14% year-over-year, while domestic coal production grew 4.4% year-on-year.8 A domestic shortfall in addition to geopolitical tensions with Australia, led to a ban on Australian thermal coal shipments, which is impacting those industries that are reliant on the fossil fuel.
Secondly, the Chinese government’s longstanding commitment to reducing carbon emissions has forced local governments to ration power so that each province can meet its carbon reduction quota before year end.
A power shortage creates uncertainty for the economy, but from a long term perspective it is a positive development as the world transitions towards clean energy. These trends will likely push the coal power tariff by up to 20% in China in the near term, and may become a tailwind for solar and wind power as these energy sources become more profitable, in our view. We think this gradual uptick in coal and gas power is unlikely to confined to China, and may become more widespread across the globe. In the same way, the latest increase in raw materials put a dent in solar sector volume growth and became a factor as to why solar panels were generally more expensive this year, the first time in the last decade.9
While we see encouraging developments within the solar, wind and smart grid industries, we are also particularly interested in battery-based energy-saving systems, which we’d expect to be in high demand as China tackles the current energy issue. Our multi-year outlook for the clean energy sector is encouraging, on the back of higher coal and gas tariffs, the world’s commitment towards reducing carbon emission and China’s dedication towards developing clean energy solutions. Overall, while we saw unprecedented market regulation, a credit event and a power shortage in China over the last quarter, we remain encouraged by the long-term prospects in China—backed by an exciting pipeline of developments we’ve observed with some innovative industry leaders.
Staying Ahead with Mirae Asset’s Latest Insights
1 Source: CLSA, 2021.
2 Source: Citi, 2021.
3 Source: CLSA, 2021.
4 Source: Caixin Insight, 2021.
5 Source: National Bureau of Statistics of China, September, 2021.
6 Source: The New York Times, October 21, 2021.
7 Source: Reuters, October 13, 2020.
8 Source: Caixin Insight, September 2021.
9 Source: Bloomberg, September 30, 2021.
Disclaimer & Information for Investors
No distribution, solicitation or advice: This document is provided for information and illustrative purposes and is intended for your use only. It is not a solicitation, offer or recommendation to buy or sell any security or other financial instrument. The information contained in this document has been provided as a general market commentary only and does not constitute any form of regulated financial advice, legal, tax or other regulated service.
The views and information discussed or referred in this document are as of the date of publication. Certain of the statements contained in this document are statements of future expectations and other forward-looking statements. Views, opinions and estimates may change without notice and are based on a number of assumptions which may or may not eventuate or prove to be accurate. Actual results, performance or events may differ materially from those in such statements. In addition, the opinions expressed may differ from those of other Mirae Asset Global Investments’ investment professionals.
Investment involves risk: Past performance is not indicative of future performance. It cannot be guaranteed that the performance of the Fund will generate a return and there may be circumstances where no return is generated or the amount invested is lost. It may not be suitable for persons unfamiliar with the underlying securities or who are unwilling or unable to bear the risk of loss and ownership of such investment. Before making any investment decision, investors should read the Prospectus for details and the risk factors. Investors should ensure they fully understand the risks associated with the Fund and should also consider their own investment objective and risk tolerance level. Investors are advised to seek independent professional advice before making any investment.
Sources: Information and opinions presented in this document have been obtained or derived from sources which in the opinion of Mirae Asset Global Investments (“MAGI”) are reliable, but we make no representation as to their accuracy or completeness. We accept no liability for a loss arising from the use of this document.
Products, services and information may not be available in your jurisdiction and may be offered by affiliates, subsidiaries and/or distributors of MAGI as stipulated by local laws and regulations. Please consult with your professional adviser for further information on the availability of products and services within your jurisdiction. This document is issued by Mirae Asset Global Investments (HK) Limited and has not been reviewed by the Securities and Futures Commission.
Information for EU investors pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/1156: This document is a marketing communication and is intended for Professional Investors only. A Prospectus is available for the Mirae Asset Global Discovery Fund (the “Company”) a société d'investissement à capital variable (SICAV) domiciled in Luxembourg structured as an umbrella with a number of sub-funds. Key Investor Information Documents (“KIIDs”) are available for each share class of each of the sub-funds of the Company.
The Company’s Prospectus and the KIIDs can be obtained from www.am.miraeasset.eu/fund-literature . The Prospectus is available in English, French, German, and Danish, while the KIIDs are available in one of the official languages of each of the EU Member States into which each sub-fund has been notified for marketing under the Directive 2009/65/EC (the “UCITS Directive”). Please refer to the Prospectus and the KIID before making any final investment decisions.
A summary of investor rights is available in English from www.am.miraeasset.eu/investor-rights-summary.
The sub-funds of the Company are currently notified for marketing into a number of EU Member States under the UCITS Directive. FundRock Management Company can terminate such notifications for any share class and/or sub-fund of the Company at any time using the process contained in Article 93a of the UCITS Directive.
Hong Kong: This document is intended for Hong Kong investors. Before making any investment decision to invest in the Fund, Investors should read the Fund’s Prospectus and the information for Hong Kong investors (of applicable) of the Fund for details and the risk factors. The individual and Mirae Asset Global Investments (Hong Kong) Limited may hold the individual securities mentioned. This document is issued by Mirae Asset Global Investments (HK) Limited and has not been reviewed by the Securities and Futures Commission.
Copyright 2021. All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission of Mirae Asset Global Investments (Hong Kong) Limited.